Franchised businesses have proven more resilient against the pandemic-induced economic downturn than their independent counterparts, but after months of lockdowns, many big brands are seeing franchisees in revolt, according to a new report at the Wall Street Journal. 

A sprawling, 2,000-word article at the Journal delved into a series of franchisor vs. franchisee fights across multiple industries  that have ended in lawsuits and public bickering. 

Subway franchisees, for example, bristled at the corporate office’s plan to sell two foot-long subs for $10, saying it was unprofitable. 

“I get that franchising isn’t a democracy, but at the same time, it’s not a dictatorship,” a Subway franchisee told the journal. 

Elsewhere, a yawning gap has opened up between the priorities of franchisees, many of whom are struggling to keep their businesses open, and franchisors, who tend to look at more macroeconomic trends. 

McDonald’s franchisees say the brand didn’t do enough to cut rent or defer royalty payments. The brand countered that it had taken “unprecedented action” by spending $100 million on marketing, according to the journal.

Read the full report here.

Don’t Miss the Next Big Franchise Story

Sign up for the 1851 Franchise newsletter to get our biggest stories before everyone else

By signing up, you agree to our user agreement (including class action waiver and arbitration provisions), and acknowledge our privacy policy.

Alex Lockie

About the Author

Alex Lockie

Follow