Franchisor Stories
Subway franchise reviews highlight a blend of global brand recognition and corporate support, but also underscore profitability struggles and frustrations with top-down mandates.
Subway is one of the world’s largest fast-food franchises, and behind its iconic sandwiches are thousands of franchisees. Reviews and forum posts by Subway franchise owners paint a mixed picture of the franchise experience. While some praise the brand’s global recognition and corporate support, many have concerns about profit margins and strict corporate mandates.
We explored franchisee accounts from Glassdoor and other reports to uncover key themes like corporate support and profitability that can be seen across reviews.
A theme in franchisee commentary is the struggle to turn a profit. For example, in a review posted by one Subway franchise owner in May 2024, the only “pro” listed was “good if you like to lose money,” followed by the blunt “cons” that “everything you do is not worth it in the end."
Owners frequently describe high fees and slim margins that make earning a living as a Subway franchisee difficult. “Hard to make money. High franchise fees. Always following McDonald’s but without the payoff,” one franchise owner wrote on Glassdoor, adding that unless an owner operates multiple stores or relies on family labor, the economics barely work.
All Subway franchisees pay 12.5% of weekly sales straight to Subway corporate (8% royalty + 4.5% advertising), according to Franchise Business Review (FBR), a notably high off-the-top charge that doesn’t include rent, food or labor costs.
Franchisees give Subway corporate mixed reviews when it comes to support. On paper, Subway offers extensive training, marketing and operational guidance — including help with site selection, operations training, financing and national advertising — which should set up new owners for success. Some franchisees acknowledge the benefits of this system, citing a well-established brand and a “large system and infrastructure for guidance” as positives.
Yet many operators feel that support from corporate is undermined by a top-down management style and onerous mandates. “Subway has had a tumultuous relationship with its franchisees for years now, often imposing certain mandates that franchisees contest,” a 2024 article on Quartz reported, detailing tensions between Subway’s headquarters and its store owners. For example, Subway’s leadership has unilaterally required costly operational changes — such as installing new meat-slicers in all U.S. stores — which franchisees complained “only create more work… and increase food waste” without a clear payoff.
FBR says that while Subway franchisees benefit from the company’s established systems, many have “experienced frustration related to pricing, store reputation and saturation in the marketplace.” In short, owners appreciate Subway’s global marketing clout and operational playbook, but they bristle at what they see as one-sided decision-making from headquarters.
Overall, franchisee reviews suggest that Subway’s franchise experience can be a double-edged sword. The brand’s sheer scale and familiarity provide a solid foundation — there’s usually a corporate playbook to follow, and customers know what to expect from a Subway. However, that same scale comes with challenges: crowded markets, rigid rules and decisions made at corporate headquarters that don’t always align with what the local owners are looking for.
For more on Subway, check out these related stories on 1851 Franchise:
Sign up for the 1851 Franchise newsletter to get our biggest stories before everyone else
By signing up, you agree to our user agreement (including class action waiver and arbitration provisions), and acknowledge our privacy policy.
